PDA

View Full Version : serms overhyped?


Massivehunt
February 13th, 2008, 05:17 PM
Im just curious if any of you guys thing that serms like clomid and nolvadex are little too hyped. The reason I ask is, I never felt any difference when taking these versus takin over the counter products such as: Gaspari novedex xt and 6oxo etcc...
Personally I think Gasparis novedex xt and 6oxo worked better for me than the real deal. Am I crazy? I also think sometimes the serms are taken too much.
Everybody is telling everyone you need a serm for this or a serm for that. Now I can see the logic for using a serm for something as strong as superdrol, but is it always necessary to have it for everything else when you have pretty solid over the counter products like novedex xt, inhibit-e, 6-oxo, alri restore, and many more etc..
Just was really curious what you guys thought about this. I hope everyone is doing well as I am tying to get rid of this nasty flu. Take care.

hardcorefitness
February 13th, 2008, 05:21 PM
I agree with you. I even had people on another board telling me i was crazy for not taking a serm on a 4 wk h-drol cycle. I agree serms have their place but I have always thought that if its not necessary to not use a serm b/c they can be more toxic on your body than the ph's themselves.

usf97j4x4
February 13th, 2008, 05:40 PM
I agree with you. I even had people on another board telling me i was crazy for not taking a serm on a 4 wk h-drol cycle. I agree serms have their place but I have always thought that if its not necessary to not use a serm b/c they can be more toxic on your body than the ph's themselves.

I agree. I am not for reckless SERMing... also the dosages some people throw around (at least for Nolva) are absolutely ridiculous. I've seen people takine 60-80 a day when 20 would probably be sufficient.

If you are prone to gyno then I would probably use it on any strong androgenic PH... if not I would just keep it around. They may be overhyped but if you can stave off a case of gyno its damn well worth it.

Massivehunt
February 13th, 2008, 06:06 PM
Interesting to know. Again what I thought was interesting is that the bodybuilders in Arnold's day hardly took pct. In fact they rarely did or knew anything about them. They just relied on the body to bounce back. Im not saying this is the way to go, Im saying serms are taken too much.

usf97j4x4
February 13th, 2008, 06:38 PM
Interesting to know. Again what I thought was interesting is that the bodybuilders in Arnold's day hardly took pct. In fact they rarely did or knew anything about them. They just relied on the body to bounce back. Im not saying this is the way to go, Im saying serms are taken too much.

Many of them were on perpetual cycles though. Probably constantly on a low dose of Dbol between main cycles

GotTest
February 13th, 2008, 07:52 PM
Many of them were on perpetual cycles though. Probably constantly on a low dose of Dbol between main cycles
Can you friggin' imagine that!
No wonder there's no Arnold Jr. running around.:D